Pittsburgh Pediatric Palliative Care Coalition
|
Family Survey Results
Winter 2005
Report
prepared by the Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management at Robert Morris
University
SURVEY RESULTS
The survey
was mailed to approximately 1020 families in January and February of 2005. Of
these, 875 were sent to families with medically fragile children; 150 to
families who had experienced the death of a child. Organizations participating
in the coalition sent out the survey with a cover letter to appropriate families
on their lists. The bulk of the mailing was done by the Make-A-Wish Foundation
of Western PA. It is possible that some families received more than one survey.
·
Total surveys
returned: 227
·
Medically
fragile: 194
·
Child who has
passed away: 33
·
Return rate: 22%
This is much higher than an average of 10% return for mailed surveys.
COUNTY

HOUSEHOLD INCOME

·
There was a fairly even distribution of income—with a fairly high
percentage at or below median household income. (55% at $50,000 or less)
·
(Median income for
Pennsylvania is
$40,000)
HOW MANY SIBLINGS?
(N = 225)
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
|
None |
36 |
16% |
|
|
One |
87 |
39% |
|
|
Two |
56 |
25% |
|
|
Three |
31 |
14% |
|
|
More than 3 |
15 |
7% |
Most
families are caring for other children in addition to their medically fragile
child. (84%) This makes needs for respite and sibling support even greater.
INSURANCE (N
= 227)
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
Medicaid |
94 |
41% |
|
Medicare |
22 |
10% |
|
Other government plan |
39 |
17% |
|
Private health insurance |
136 |
60% |
|
Other |
25 |
11% |
|
None
|
3 |
1% |
We believe
the number of children on Medicaid was reported low. Most if not all of the
medically fragile children would qualify for Medicaid. It is likely that those
listing “other” or “other government plan” actually are receiving Medicaid but
think of it as “Gateway” or “UPMC”, the provider of the Medicaid services.
RACE (N=227)
|
|
# |
% |
|
Caucasian |
196 |
86% |
|
African-American |
20 |
9% |
|
Asian |
1 |
.4% |
|
Latino |
2 |
1% |
|
Other |
4 |
2% |
This
sampling is fairly representative of the population surveyed (84% of Allegheny
County residents and 96% of Westmoreland County are White. )
DIAGNOSIS:
N=227
|
|
# |
% |
|
Cancer/ Oncology |
22 |
10% |
|
Heart/ Cardiology |
34 |
15% |
|
Lungs/ Pulmonology |
31 |
14% |
|
Gastroenterology |
36 |
16% |
|
Blood/ Hematology |
13 |
6% |
|
Neurology |
103 |
45% |
|
Rheumatology |
4 |
2% |
|
Transplants |
11 |
5% |
|
Immunology |
4 |
2% |
|
Urology/Nephrology |
17 |
8% |
BORN
WITH CONDITION:
N=222
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
Born
with the condition |
163 |
73% |
|
Acquired disease |
59 |
27% |
AGE

DEMOGRAPHICS FOR FAMILIES WHO HAD
EXPERIENCED THE DEATH OF A CHILD

WHERE DID
CHILD
PASS
AWAY? N=33
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
in the hospital |
10 |
30% |
|
at home |
21 |
64% |
|
Other |
2 |
6% |
Of the children who died, 18
received hospice.
AGE
OF CHILD AT DEATH
N=33
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
Under a year |
3 |
9% |
|
1+
to 5 years |
10 |
30% |
|
5+
to 11 years |
10 |
30% |
|
11+
to 18 years |
7 |
21% |
|
18+
to 21 years |
3 |
9% |
HOW RECENT WAS THE CHILD’S
DEATH?
N=33
|
|
# |
Percent |
|
Less
than a year |
8 |
24% |
|
1 to
2 years |
8 |
24% |
|
2 to
3 years |
6 |
18% |
|
3 to
5 years |
6 |
18% |
|
More
than 5 years ago |
5 |
15% |
Half of
the respondents whose child passed away are referring to experiences of how the
system was over two years ago.
SERVICES RECEIVED:
n=194
n=33 n=227
|
|
By families w/ medically fragile child |
By families who have experienced the death of a child |
All |
|
Case
management/social worker |
57% |
58% |
56% |
|
Pain
management |
4% |
30% |
8% |
|
Home
health care |
25% |
36% |
27% |
|
Support groups |
9% |
52% |
10% |
|
Hospice |
1% |
55% |
8% |
|
Respite* |
44% |
52% |
45% |
|
None |
33% |
15% |
31% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Majority provided by extended family. |
DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES
·
Non-whites were
slightly more likely to have reported that their families received no services.
(42% vs. 29%)
·
Lower income
families had similar knowledge about services available as higher income
counterparts. They also reported receiving no services at a similar rate as
their higher income counterparts. (There was a slight increase in reporting no
services as incomes rose).
·
Married parents
were slightly more likely to know about services than single/divorced/ widowed
parents.
RESPITE
Respite was the biggest issue
for most respondents. Having the funds to pay for respite care was the biggest
barrier. Many had home health care providers, but didn’t have access to funding
to pay for respite care hours. Families reported a need for additional overnight
respite care, but had a mixed response to facility based respite care. Some
reported that they would use facility-based care, others wanted in-home respite
only. Those that thought they would use a facility reported the need to be
comfortable with the caregivers and the importance of developing a long term
relationship with them.
82% OF FAMILIES HAD HEARD OF RESPITE CARE.
RESPITE PROVIDER:
N=227
|
|
# |
% |
|
Extended family member |
|
41% |
|
Organization nonprofit |
|
2% |
|
Day
care facility |
|
2% |
|
Home
health care agency |
|
12% |
|
Other* |
|
11% |
|
We
don’t use respite care |
|
40% |
*The other category was
generally a privately hired caregiver.
N= 198

AMOUNT OF DAYTIME RESPITE
RECEIVED
n=206
|
|
Received |
Needed |
|
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
|
None |
93 |
45% |
83 |
42% |
|
Less
than 1 hour a month |
15 |
7% |
7 |
4% |
|
1-2
hours a week |
21 |
10% |
22 |
11% |
|
3-6
hours a week |
16 |
8% |
29 |
15% |
|
12-24 hours a week |
29 |
14% |
37 |
19% |
|
48-72 hours a week |
9 |
4% |
14 |
7% |
|
full
time assisted care |
2 |
1% |
5 |
3% |
|
Not
Applicable |
21 |
10% |
1 |
1% |
|
Total |
206 |
|
198 |
|
Twenty-five percent (25%) had six or less hours a week. 57% of families need
respite care.
Out of 123 families who needed daytime respite for their
child, 50% felt they needed more daytime respite hours than they received. A
third needed significantly more respite than they received.
BARRIERS TO RESPITE
(For families who have
experienced the death of a child n=33)*
|
|
# |
% |
|
Didn't know services were available |
7 |
21% |
|
No
services available for my child |
3 |
9% |
|
Didn't accept tech dependent children |
1 |
3% |
|
Times available weren't convenient |
1 |
3% |
|
Too
few allowable days per year |
1 |
3% |
|
Agency couldn't meet demand |
3 |
9% |
|
Other |
5 |
15% |
|
Not
applicable |
13 |
39% |
|
Lack
of money |
0 |
0% |
*this question was worded
differently on the two surveys
WHO REFERRED YOU TO RESPITE
n=194
|
|
# |
% |
|
Have
never been referred |
36 |
19% |
|
Caseworker/ Social Worker |
33 |
17% |
|
My
own research |
9 |
5% |
|
Another Parent |
8 |
4% |
|
School |
8 |
4% |
|
Support Group |
8 |
4% |
|
Doctor |
6 |
3% |
|
Other |
6 |
3% |
|
Hospital |
5 |
3% |
|
Not
Applicable |
68 |
35% |
OVERNIGHT RESPITE
n=192
|