Welcome

  What Is Palliative Care

Members

 Associated Organizations

Family Subcommittee
Resources
Questionnaire
Focus Groups
Survey Results

  Meeting Minutes

PPPCC History

Let's Stay In Touch

Pittsburgh Pediatric Palliative Care Coalition

 

Family Survey Results

Winter 2005

 

Report prepared by the Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management at Robert Morris University


SURVEY RESULTS


 

The survey was mailed to approximately 1020 families in January and February of 2005.  Of these, 875 were sent to families with medically fragile children; 150 to families who had experienced the death of a child. Organizations participating in the coalition sent out the survey with a cover letter to appropriate families on their lists.  The bulk of the mailing was done by the Make-A-Wish Foundation of Western PA.  It is possible that some families received more than one survey.

·          Total surveys returned: 227

·          Medically fragile: 194

·          Child who has passed away: 33

·          Return rate:  22% This is much higher than an average of 10% return for mailed surveys.

COUNTY

 


HOUSEHOLD INCOME

  

 

·          There was a fairly even distribution of income—with a fairly high percentage at or below median household income. (55% at $50,000 or less)

·          (Median income for Pennsylvania is $40,000)


HOW MANY SIBLINGS?          (N = 225)

 

#

Percent

 

None

36

16%

 

One

87

39%

 

Two

56

25%

 

Three

31

14%

 

More than 3

15

7%

 Most families are caring for other children in addition to their medically fragile child. (84%) This makes needs for respite and sibling support even greater.


INSURANCE          (N = 227)

 

#

Percent

Medicaid

94

41%

Medicare

22

10%

Other government plan

39

17%

Private health insurance

136

60%

Other

25

11%

None

3

1%

We believe the number of children on Medicaid was reported low.  Most if not all of the medically fragile children would qualify for Medicaid.  It is likely that those listing “other” or “other government plan” actually are receiving Medicaid but think of it as “Gateway” or “UPMC”, the provider of the Medicaid services.


RACE          (N=227)

 

#

 %

Caucasian

196

86%

African-American

20

9%

Asian

1

.4%

Latino

2

1%

Other

4

2%

 This sampling is fairly representative of the population surveyed (84% of Allegheny County residents and 96% of Westmoreland County are White.  )


DIAGNOSIS:                                                     N=227

 

#

%

Cancer/ Oncology

22

10%

Heart/ Cardiology

34

15%

Lungs/ Pulmonology

31

14%

Gastroenterology

36

16%

Blood/ Hematology

13

6%

Neurology

103

45%

Rheumatology

4

2%

Transplants

11

5%

Immunology

4

2%

Urology/Nephrology

17

8%

 


 BORN WITH CONDITION:                           N=222

 

#

Percent

Born with the condition  

163

73%

Acquired disease

59

27%

 


AGE 


DEMOGRAPHICS FOR FAMILIES WHO HAD EXPERIENCED THE DEATH OF A CHILD 

 



WHERE DID CHILD PASS AWAY?       
N=33

 

#

Percent

in the hospital

10

30%

at home

21

64%

Other

2

6%

Of the children who died, 18 received hospice.

 AGE OF CHILD AT DEATH                                N=33

 

#

Percent

Under a year

3

9%

1+ to 5 years

10

30%

5+ to 11 years

10

30%

11+ to 18 years

7

21%

18+ to 21 years

3

9%

  

HOW RECENT WAS THE CHILD’S DEATH?       N=33

 

#

Percent

Less than a year

8

24%

1 to 2 years

8

24%

2 to 3 years

6

18%

3 to 5 years

6

18%

More than 5 years ago

5

15%

 Half of the respondents whose child passed away are referring to experiences of how the system was over two years ago. 

 

 

SERVICES RECEIVED:                                            n=194                 n=33               n=227

 

By families w/ medically fragile child

By families who have experienced the death of a child

All

Case management/social worker

57%

58%

56%

Pain management

4%

30%

8%

Home health care

25%

36%

27%

Support groups

9%

52%

10%

Hospice

1%

55%

8%

Respite*

44%

52%

45%

None

33%

15%

31%

 

 

 

 

*Majority provided by extended family. 

 

DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES

·          Non-whites were slightly more likely to have reported that their families received no services. (42% vs. 29%) [1]

·          Lower income families had similar knowledge about services available as higher income counterparts.  They also reported receiving no services at a similar rate as their higher income counterparts. (There was a slight increase in reporting no services as incomes rose).

·          Married parents were slightly more likely to know about services than single/divorced/ widowed parents. 

RESPITE

Respite was the biggest issue for most respondents. Having the funds to pay for respite care was the biggest barrier.  Many had home health care providers, but didn’t have access to funding to pay for respite care hours. Families reported a need for additional overnight respite care, but had a mixed response to facility based respite care.  Some reported that they would use facility-based care, others wanted in-home respite only.  Those that thought they would use a facility reported the need to be comfortable with the caregivers and the importance of developing a long term relationship with them. 

 

82% OF FAMILIES HAD HEARD OF RESPITE CARE.

 

DAYTIME RESPITE:

 

RESPITE PROVIDER:                                        N=227

 

#

%

Extended family member

 

41%

Organization nonprofit

 

2%

Day care facility

 

2%

Home health care agency

 

12%

Other*

 

11%

We don’t use respite care

 

40%

 

*The other category was generally a privately hired caregiver.

 


N= 198


 

AMOUNT OF DAYTIME RESPITE RECEIVED      n=206

 

Received

Needed

 

#

%

#

%

None

93

45%

83

42%

Less than 1 hour a month

15

7%

7

4%

1-2 hours a week

21

10%

22

11%

3-6 hours a week

16

8%

29

15%

12-24 hours a week

29

14%

37

19%

48-72 hours a week

9

4%

14

7%

full time assisted care

2

1%

5

3%

Not Applicable

21

10%

1

1%

Total

206

 

198

 

 

Twenty-five percent (25%) had six or less hours a week.  57% of families need respite care.

Out of 123 families who needed daytime respite for their child, 50% felt they needed more daytime respite hours than they received.  A third needed significantly more respite than they received.


BARRIERS TO RESPITE

(For families who have experienced the death of a child n=33)*

 

#

%

Didn't know services were available

7

21%

No services available for my child

3

9%

Didn't accept tech dependent children

1

3%

Times available weren't convenient

1

3%

Too few allowable days per year

1

3%

Agency couldn't meet demand

3

9%

Other

5

15%

Not applicable

13

39%

Lack of money

0

0%

*this question was worded differently on the two surveys


WHO REFERRED YOU TO RESPITE   n=194

 

#

%

Have never been referred

36

19%

Caseworker/ Social Worker

33

17%

My own research

9

5%

Another Parent

8

4%

School

8

4%

Support Group

8

4%

Doctor

6

3%

Other

6

3%

Hospital

5

3%

Not Applicable

68

35%

 


OVERNIGHT RESPITE

 OVERNIGHT RESPITE                          n=192

 

Received

Needed

 

#

%